Words make it possible for humans to Conceive Of, Communicate, and Understand abstract concepts, like "We hold these Truths to be. Self-Evident ..."
Therefore, if the words a person is able to use are controlled, or limited, the person is contolled, and limited in what she or he is able to conceive of, communicate, or understand. Her or his ability to reason or even think is controlled and limited.
Yet the majority of people who
label themselves Conservatives or Republicans
are horribly careless in their use of words.
And seem to lack an appreciation of their Power.
For example, with no exceptions, the only people who have ever told me "You can't say that or they will call you a bad name" are people who label themselves Republican of Conservative.
And for that reason, no collectivists minion has ever found it necessary, or dared, to tell me that.
Or look at the muddling of Republican and Conservative. Almost no one understands those terms refer to two different concepts. Not alternatives.
That's because this This is America, and in America, voters do not have the power to "Throw the bums out.
Although I hope someday to seriously pursue a law that invalidates any election in which no candidate achieves 60%. Then requires a new election in which no initial candidate may participate. But I drift.
My point: Republican and Conservative represent different concepts. They do not represent alternatives.
Republican refers to a Party that offers candidates who voters can use to replace the bums: Conservative refers to a set of beliefs.
Beliefs. that often seem more like like inconsistent, and loosely defined, complaints.
Things to be against. Complaints that offer no way to replace the bums. Complaints that mostly just rail against the unfairness of collectivists attacks. Often resorting to the kind of name calling Conservatives critize the collectivists of using.
Quite often seemingly singing only to the choir.
But never offering something that can be done, especially that requires surrendering the "Army of One" as a self-image. Or requires many to pursue in a coordinated fashion that would require a material contribution of time, effort, and risk of public criticism.
No. An additional new party that actually offers candidates with enough money and manpower backing to get elected doesn't automatically pose the risk of "Splitting the vote".
That risk only exists for Third Parties led by
people silly enough to make their new party's first,
and only, purpose electing its very own President.
Absent that, there are many public offices where replacing a "Lesser of two evils" Republican incumbent would do good. But again I drift.
Regardless, I don't yet know how to best oranize this section to serve as both a reference, and a learning resource for new candidates.
So for now I'll just add some examples I hope will make the future direction of this page self–evident.
That is because it leaves them as the only one classifying other human beings by a characteristic she or he was not allowed to choose, and is prohibited from changing.
In short, learn the magnificent superiority of the Melting Pot over the collectivists' Mosaic that cruelly assigns human beings at birth, without their consent to a color–coded box, surrounded by brittle grout borders, from which they may not escape without punishment, and in which no wrong–colored friends may joining them.
Same concept. But the words used to ask it will produce materially different results.
That's because you, and I, and our fellow Americans, are the Public — there is no such thing as "The Private Sector". That's why they call them publicly traded stocks.
Especially, when you will notice that ever more Public Office (our office, not their seats) complain about the the once honorable title of Public Servant, and see you and me as their "CLients", if not sheep in need of their shepherding.
Vagrants who refuse to use the multi-million taxpayer dollar shelters and programs.
People who refuse help, because they come with rules that prohibited drugging and drunking in which they can freely engage when collonizing land owned by the public. And they come with requirements that the person work hard to seek and engage in work that would allow them to be self-supporting.
And the sin in labeling vagrants with homeless, is it results in the small fixed, not growing, percent of people truly cursed with mental problems being pushed aside, because unlike the agressive, vocal, vagrent community.
While people to whom a decent society owes help, are overshadowed, and ignored, by a sick media that's found more money in pandering to human nature's darkest attraction to things purient, and titilating.
A media that fawns on the more agressive, more vocal vagrents who are also more cunningly skilled at spinning emotional stories to fill today's insatiable demand for stories that pander to interest in the worst of human instincts.
While the people who are born cursed by mental affliction are left terrified by a world they can't comprehend, hidding in the shadown &mdash: not boldly colonizing land owned by other people — desperately alone, and for lack of colorfullness, forgotten. Whether your beliefs are in God, or Karma, the result is the same. Neither predicts that sins this great can go forever unforgiven.
So an intelligent intellectually honest response is to ask what will they say to the parents of thousands of children who will now die hard deaths in the future, because they spent just borrowed $3 Trillion dollars and spent in on everything but cancer research? or Alheitzhemers research? Or Parkinson's Disease research?
I'm an actuary, so I know by instinct you cannot "Save" a life. I mean the only thing anyone ever has to do in this world is die. Everything else is optional. Therefore, the only honest claim is that a cost will prolong a life. Which begs an honest comparison of how long?
$3 Trillion is $9,000 per infant, child, adolescent,adult and elder. That mean $45,000 was just borrowe and spent in the names of a family with 2 children and one dependent elder. But no such family received even as much as $3,000. Therefore, another fair question to ask a "even one life is worth any cost" collectivist is exactly where did the other $33,000 that family will have to repay go?
A better approach starts by distinguishing between:
Sadly, George Orwell's 1984 has been successfully expunged from the minds of the last several generations. Literally thrown down Big Brother's Memory Hole by the Professional Educators.
Therefore, we can not expect any young person to see that Polilticaly self-Censored Speak (PC Speak) being successfully enforced by today's collectivists is a horribly evil implimention of Big Brother's NewSpeak. The language imposed by Big Brother on the fictional world Orwell wrote about to describe the the horror of Stalin's absolute tyranny.
For those denied an education that included that magnificently precisnet book, one thing Big Brother used to sustain absloute tyranny was to rewrite all books in a new language he named NewSpeak. And throw the originals down the Memorey Hole (An gigantic incinerator). Logically identical to Google expunging material its collectivist monopoly owner does today.
do when they cull "incorrect" books
out of school libraries.